Last weekend I went to see the Sebastian Salgado film ‘ Salt of the Earth’
It was at the charming, tiny Chipping Norton Theatre – not many people there but interestingly in the ads before one for the joining a debate about the Leverson Enquiry.
I’ve looked on- line for it…trying to remember the address, but it was on screen for such a short time I cant find it…Odd as the video was quite long….
Very pertinent as both Rebekah Brooks and David Cameron live a spit away from the Theatre….
About the film, it was shot by his son and Wim Wenders and fascinating though some of his images very distressing and as an autobiography left a lot of personal and, for me, ethical questions about his work and approach, hanging in the air.
I didn’t like the fact that his face was used as an overlay so much with him talking. Just his voice would’ve been fine and interviews separate.
It mixed him and his work up and maybe that’s what it was supposed to do: maybe, but the harshest of realities of some of his outstandingly beautiful images was enough of a contrast without the rather romantic approach to his life and decision making.
Still it was powerful film and interesting from a ‘witnessing’ point of view about what images to shoot and why.
Also how his interests developed as he changed…. because of the images he had taken.
A real reflexivity there..
I’d still have preferred to realise that myself rather having it directed at me with the portrait overlay.
Made me wonder about my recent effort…. and whether that says what I hope it does.
In contrast to that film, a Feature available on DVD and at cinemas, is Adam Curtis’s, iPlayer only, Bitter Lake which I don’t think I’ve posted about, but meant to…
I saw it a month or two ago and it really is transforming. An ‘enjoyable’ film in its own right, so intelligent in its analysis and the quality of its making.
I’ve only remembered to blog about it when Jonathan mentioned him in one of the Skype chats. It is focused on events in Afghanistan and how the situation came to be.
Lots of factual stuff presented very clearly within a ‘beautiful’ visual narrative that also alludes to ideologies without overstating them.
Really impressive. I will watch more of his work.
It seems appropriate to watch these especially as journalism as a form of witnessing and documenting have come to my attention even more through the Reading Room work
I started the MA thinking about Documentation and Myth but things have sort of changed….I’ll have to assess how exactly.
Previously I was interested in the ‘truth’ of documentation and the effects of subjectivity etc..styles of Reportage but I need to address some of my thoughts about style in the very least…..
The other is Bowling for Columbine, which I watched some time ago.
Style completely different and of course, Michael More features in it.
What is great is the relationship he builds up with people and so what he manages to report.
It is the peoples’ ‘ truth’ as you can see it spoken but his interview style and way of working is really clever and of course the content is fascinating, and funny as well as horrific. A very clever combination.
So, I’m not going to make documentary film but the styles are still important.
I haven’t discussed cinematography or anything here…just really reminding me over the overall differences in style…
And also the effect the Leverson enquiry has had on the British Press and how we , as a public, perceive ‘it’.
A very different ideology from that in 1903 when the Reading Room opened!